| |
|
| | Home » Tax Incidence » Progressive Tax | |
Progressive Tax |
| |
The progressive tax is a particular form of tax which is imposed on the tax payers so that the effective tax rate increments as the amount to which the rate is applied increases. The term progressive tax describes an effect of distribution which is quite often applied to any type of tax system in the case of both consumption or income and it meets the definition which is laid in the context of tax.
|
It is quite often applied with reference to income taxes. In these cases those people who are having with more disposable income, they are required to pay a higher percentage of that income in tax, in comparison to those who are surviving on a less rate of income. The term progressive indicates to the way where the rate of tax progresses from low to high. The term can also be applied to the adjustment of the tax base by using tax exemptions, tax credits, or selective taxation that would create progressive distributional effects.
The basic idea of the progressive income tax has collected support from economists and political scientists who are blessed with several kind of different ideologies, ranging from scholars and visionaries like, Adam Smith to Karl Marx. Many authorities who have the capability trace the origin of modern progressive taxation, have derived the basic idea and basic foundation of their thoughts from Adam Smith, the famous author of the Wealth of Nations. Almost when more than a century was over, Karl Marx argued on behalf of a progressive income tax in The Communist Manifest and said that the most advanced countries a heavy progressive or graduated income tax will be applicable in a quite general sense of the term.
There are several basic benefits behind the implementation of the progressive tax, such as:
- If the utility which gained from the income has the capability of exhibiting diminishing marginal returns and which factor has also been asserted by several psychologists from all over the world. When the time will come, then the tax burden is required to be shared in a utilitarian way and the tax-bill must increase non-linearly with income.
- With the rise in the income levels the various levels of consumption have a tendency to fall. Thus this thing is argued quite often that the demand for economic development can be energized by reducing tax burden on lower incomes while raising the burden on higher incomes.
- There is also a quite appreciated argument that those persons who are having a higher rate of income in their hands, their income tend to have a higher percentage in comparison with the disposable rate of income. This thing can afford a greater tax burden which is having a vertical equity argument. There are many persons who basically claim that a person who is making exactly enough money to pay for food and housing cannot afford to pay any taxes without it causing material damage, while someone making twice as much can afford to pay up to half their income in taxes.
| | | |
| | | |
| |
